Is Wagner’s law applicable for fast growing economies? BRICS and MATIK countries
This study investigates the effects of public spending, which is placed among the public sector’s economic activities, on the economic growth. The relationship in which the increase of public sector spending moves together with the growth is called as Wagner’s Law and it is examined through developing countries’ data. The hypothesis which is being tested is “there is a positive relationship between public spending and economic growth”. The study focuses on 10 different fast growing countries’ economies’ data which are as firstly so called “BRICS Countries” which is composed of the fastest developing countries as Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa and secondly “MATIK Countries” which is contained of other fast developing countries as Mexico, Argentina, Turkey, Indonesia and Korea. Hypothesis is tested by using time series for the analyses. The primary contribution which the study would like to make is to bring attention to “MATIK economies”. This is a leading study in which Wagner’s Law is tested in addition to the fact that these country groups are moved to the agenda together. According to the applied test results, the findings that illustrate Wagner’s Rule is not valid for almost all the countries (BRICS+MATIK; BM) are reached.
Afxentiou, P. C. & Serletis, A. (1996). Government expenditures in the European Union: Do they converge or follow Wagner’s Law, International Economic Journal, 10, 33-47. DOI: 10.1080/10168739600000003
Aggarwal, R. (2013). Adjusting to BRICs in Glass Houses: Replacing Obsolete Institutions and Business Models, Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(1), 37-54. DOI: 10.1002/tie.21522
Akinlo, E. E. (2013). Government spending and national income nexus for Nigeria, Global Journal of Business Research, 7(1), 33-41.
Akitoby, B., Clements, B., Gupta, S. & Inchauste, G. (2006). Public spending, voracity, and Wagner’s Law in developing countries, European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 908-928. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.12.001
Aktan, B., Mandaci, P. E., Kopurlu, B. S. & Ersener, B. (2009). Behavior of Emerging Stock Markets in The Global Financial Meltdown: Evidence From BRIC-A. African Journal of Business Management, 3(9), 396-404. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM09.121
Alesina, A. & Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, country size and government, Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 305–321. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00010-3
Andre´s, J., Domenech, R. & Fatas, A. (2008). The stabilizing role of government size, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32, 571–593. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2007.02.006
Barro, R. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S103-S125. DOI: 10.1086/261726
Barro, R. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443. DOI: 10.2307/2937943
Bashirli, S. & Sabiroglu, I. M. (2013). Testing Wagner’s Law in an oil-exporting economy: The case of Azerbaijan, Transition Studies Review, 20(3), 295-307. DOI: 10.1007/s11300-013-0292-4
Biehl, D. (1998). Wagner’s Law: An introduction to and a translation of the last version of Adolph Wagner’s text of 1911, Public Finance, 53(1), 102-111.
Bird, R. M. (1971). Wagner's of Law' of expanding state activity, Public Finance, 26, 1-26.
Blackley, P. R. (2003). Price versus income effects as sources of growth in government’s share of GDP, Public Finance Review, 31(3), 241-262. DOI: 10.1177/1091142103031003002
Brückner, M., Chong, A. & Gradstein, M. (2012). Estimating the permanent income elasticity of government expenditures: Evidence on Wagner’s Law based on oil price shocks, Journal of Public Economics, 96(11-12), 1025-1035. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.08.002
Campo, S. S. (1998). Government employment and pay: The global and regional evidence, Public Administration and Development, 18(5), 457-478. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-162X(199812)18:5<457::AID-PAD40>3.0.CO;2-P
Chi-Hung, L. L. & Chiehwen E. H. (2008). The association between government expenditure and economic growth: Granger causality test of US data, 1947-2002, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting, and Financial Management, 20(4), 439-452.
Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators of Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427-431. DOI: 10.2307/2286348
Dolenc, P. (2009). Wagner’s Law is still applicable: Empirical evidence for Slovenia, Nase Gospodarstvo, 55(5-6), 68-76.
Durevall, D. & Henrekson, M. (2011). The futile quest for a grand explanation of long-run government expenditure, Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 708-722. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1539425
Easterly, W. & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 417–458. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(93)90025-B
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. 1987. Co-integration and errors correction: Representation, estimation, and testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
Fatas, A. & Mihov, I. (2001). Government size and automatic stabilizers: International and international evidence, Journal of International Economics, 55(2), 3–28. DOI: 10.2307/1913236
Florio, M. & Colautti, S. (2005). A logistic growth theory of public expenditures: A study of five country over 100 years, Public Choice, 122(3), 355-393. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-005-3900-y
Furuoka, F. (2008). Wagner’s Law in Malaysia: A New empirical evidence, The Icfai University Journal of Applied Economics, 7, 33-43.
Futagami, K., Morita, Y. & Shibata A. (1993). Dynamic analysis of an endogenous growth model with public capital, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(4), 607-625. DOI:: 10.2307/3440914
Ghartey, E. E. (2008). The budgetary process and economic growth: Empirical evidence of the Jamaican economy, Economic Modelling, 25(6), 1128-1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2008.02.004
Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, 373), 424-438. DOI: 10.2307/1912791
Grenade, K. & Wright, A. (2013). Public spending in selected Caribbean countries: Testing Wagner’s Law and the Ratchet Hypothesis, Public Finance Review, 42(4), 1-24. DOI: 10.1177/1091142113499395
Gurgul, H., Lach, L. & Mestel, R. (2012). The relationship between budgetary expenditure and economic growth in Poland, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(1), 161-182. DOI: 10.1007/s10100-010-0186-z
Henrekson, M. (1993). Wagner’s Law-A Spurious Relationship, Public Finance, 46(3), 406-415.
Inigues-Montiel, A. J. (2010). Government expenditure and national income in Mexico: Keynes versus Wagner, Applied Economics Letters, 17(9), 887-893. DOI: 10.1080/13504850802599433
Islam, A. M. (2001). Wagner’s Law revisited: Cointegration and exogeneity tests for the USA, Applied Economics Letters, 8(8), 509-515. DOI: 10.1080/13504850010018743
Iyare, S. O. & Lorde, T. (2004). Co-integration, causality and Wagner’s Law: tests for selected Caribbean countries, Applied Economics Letters, 11(13), 815-825. DOI: 10.1080/1350485042000254881
Johansen, S. & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
Kalu, I. E. & James, O. E. (2012). Government expenditure and economic growth in Nigeria, 1980-2011, International Journal of Academic Research, 4(6), 204-208. DOI: 10.7813/2075-4124.2012/4-6/B.32
Kalam, M. A. & Aziz, N. (2009). Growth of government expenditure in Bangladesh: An empirical enquiry into the validity of Wagner’s Law, Global Economy Journal, 9(2), 1-20. DOI: 10.2202/1524-5861.1451
Kargı, B. (2014). The effects of BRICS and MATIK counties on world economy and cointegration analysis the long term relation with G-7 growth rates (1962-2012), Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(3), 262-272.
Khan, M. (2011). The Fall of The Wall, The Rise of The BRICs and The New Scramble for Africa. Foresight, 13(3), 38-49. DOI: 10.1108/14636681111138758
Kumar, S., Webber, D. J. & Fargher, S. (2012). Wagner’s Law revisited: Cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand, Applied Economics, 44(5), 607-616. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2010.511994
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary Against the Alternative of a Unit Root, Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
Lamartina, S. & Zaghini, A. (2010). Increasing public expenditure: Wagner’s Law in OECD countries, German Economic Review, 12(2), 149-164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2010.00517.x
Liu, L. C-H., Hsu, C. E. and Younis, M. Z. (2008). The association between government expenditure and economic growth: Granger causality test of US data, 1947-2002, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 20(4), 537-553.
Magazzino, C. (2012). Wagner versus Keynes: Public spending and national income in Italy, Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(6), 890-905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2012.05.012
Milesi Ferretti, G. M., Perotti, R. & Rostagno, M. (2002). Electoral systems and public spending, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 609–656. DOI: 10.1162/003355302753650346
Narayan, P. K., Prasad, A. & Singh, B. (2008). A test of the Wagner’s Hypothesis for the Fiji Islands, Applied Economics, 40(21), 2793-2801. DOI: 10.1080/00036840600972472
Narayan, P. K., Nielsen, I. & Smyth, R. (2008). Panel data, cointegration, causality and Wagner’s Law: Empirical evidence from Chinese provinces, China Economic Review, 19(2), 297-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2006.11.004
Narayan, S., Rath, B. N. & Narayan, P. K. (2012). Evidence of Wagner’s Law from Indian states, Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1548-1557. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.004
Oxley, L. (1994). Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: a test for Britain, 1870-1913, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41(3), 286-298. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9485.1994.tb01127.x
Pesaran, M. H. & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis, in Econometrics and Economic Theory in the Increasing Public Expenditure 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, (Eds) S. Storm, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.371-413.
Phillips, P. C. B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for an unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
Ram, R. (1986). Causality between income and government expenditure: a broad international perspective, Public Finance, 41(3), 393-414.
Ram, R. (1987). Wagner’s hypothesis in time series and cross-section perspectives: evidence from ‘real’ data for 115 countries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(2), 194-204. DOI: 10.2307/1927226
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments?, Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. DOI: 10.1086/250038
Roubini, N. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). A growth model of inflation, tax evasion, and financial repression, Journal of Monetary Economics, 35(2), 275-301. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(95)01192-Q
Roy, A. G. (2009). Evidence on economic growth and government size, Applied Economics, 41(5), 607-614. DOI: 10.1080/00036840601007393
Rufael, Y. W. (2008). The Revenue-Expenditure Nexus: The experience of 13 African counties, African Development Review, 20(2), 273-283. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2008.00185.x
Sakyi, D. (2013). On the implications of trade openness, foreign aid and democracy for Wagner’s Law in developing countries: Panel data evidence from West African monetary zone (WAMZ), The Journal of Developing Area, 47(2), 319-339. DOI: 10.1353/jda.2013.0033
Samudram, M., Nair, M. & Vaithilingam, S. (2009). Keynes and Wagner on government expenditures and economic development: The case of a developing economy, Empirical Economics, 36(3), 697-712. DOI: 10.1007/s00181-008-0214-1
Schmalz, S. & Ebenau, M. (2012). After Neoliberalism? Brazil, India, and China in the Global Economic Crisis. Globalization, 9(4), 487-501. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2012.699917
Singh, S. (2013). Future of Golden BRICS, Strategic Analysis. 37(4), 393-397. DOI: 10.1080/09700161.2013.802513
Tang, C. F. (2008). Wagner’s Law versus Keynesian Hypothesis: New evidence from recursive regression-based causality approaches, ICFAI Journal of Public Finance, 6, 29-38.
Tang, C. F. (2010). Wagner’s Law versus Keynesian Hypothesis in Malaysia: An impressionistic view, International Journal of Business and Society, 11, 87-96.
Thornton, J. (1999). Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Europe, Applied Economics Letters, 6(7), 413-416. DOI: 10.1080/135048599352916
Turnovsky, S. (1997). Fiscal policy in a growing economy with public capital, Macroeconomic Dynamics, 1(3), 615-639. DOI: 10.1017/S1365100597004045
Wahab, M. (2004). Economic growth and government expenditure: evidence from a new test specification, Applied Economics, 36(19), 2125–2135. DOI: 10.1080/0003684042000306923
Wu, A. M., & Lin, M. (2012). Determinants of government size: Evidence from China, Public Choice, 151(1), 255-270. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-010-9746-y
Yao, X. N. & Liu, J. Y. (2011). The Potential of Economic Growth and Technology Advancement in The BRICS, Proceedings of The 2011, International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, pp.1067-1071, 10-13 July, Guilin.
Zaman, K., Khan, M. M., Ahmad, M. & Khilii, B. A. (2011). Growth, employment, exports and Wagner’s Law: Evidence from Pakistan’s agriculture sector (1960-2009), International Journal of Rural Management, 7(1-2), 27-41. DOI: 10.1177/0973005212459825
Copyright (c) 2016 Bilal KARGI
The editorial board is participating in a growing community of CrossCheck System’s users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy, aiming to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review.
Since 2014 (7th Volume), Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business uses DOI (Digital Object Identifier) as a permanent citation link to content article.
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)